skip to main content

Is Walkability a Luxury?

Robert Steutville is editor of Public Square: A CNU Journal, and he has some opinions about that.  His passionate response to a 2016 book titled The Human City: Urbanism for the Rest of Us, by Joel Kotkin, and the idea that walkable neighborhoods are a luxury that is not attainable for middle-class Americans, connects the dots between transportation and affordable housing.wellston-metrolink-walkability-workshop-21-728

Steutville begins by breaking down the standards for which affordable housing is judged.  The most common standard for affordability is that someone should not pay more than 30 percent of their income on housing.  Steutville argues that transportation costs should be factored into this affordability equation, a sentiment shared with the Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT).  CNT developed a Housing + Transportation Affordability Index (H&T Index) with a target of 45 percent or less being spent each month on combined housing and transportation needs.

The H&T Index reveals that walkable neighborhoods reduce the combined costs of housing and transportation.  Residents of walkable neighborhoods benefit from reduced automobile dependence.  Cutting automobile use in half can save as much as $5,000 or more per year.

Steutville sums up his thoughts by linking walkability to several other benefits including, health, pollution, and time.  “Walkable neighborhoods add value and utility to lives of people of all classes.  They are willing to pay for that value,” he writes.

Will policy makers heed Steutville’s call to reduce barriers to building housing in walkable neighborhoods?

Send us your thoughts at

In response to this article @RonaldJDonson1 offered these suggestions, “For one, a traffic light at Grand and 40. The walk from Grand to SLU and Grand Center is a death trap. Maybe some way finding from CWE station through the med campus. Most importantly mixed use development on surface lots downtown, especially around civic center.”

Translate »